fixing some grammar

← Older revision Revision as of 14:59, 20 May 2019
Line 10: Line 10:
 
At the P2P Foundation, we settle around the following definition.
 
At the P2P Foundation, we settle around the following definition.
   
A commons is a 1) shared resources (i.e. there is something objective about it) 2) maintained or co-produced by a community or group of stakeholders (hence: a subjective activity and choice, 'there is no commons without commoning') and 3) it is managed according to te rules and values of that community ('autonormativity'), which makes it also into an alternative governance and property regime.
+
A commons is 1) shared resources (i.e. there is something objective about it) 2) maintained or co-produced by a community or group of stakeholders (hence: a subjective activity and choice, 'there is no commons without commoning') and 3) it is managed according to the rules and values of that community ('autonormativity'), which makes it also an alternative governance and property regime.
   
This definition distinguishes us from all those who replace the objectivity of the commons with a generic metaphysical principles (1) , which believe it is synomymous with common goods only (2) and which deny it is a property and/or governance form (3).
+
This definition distinguishes us from all those who replace the objectivity of the commons with a generic metaphysical principles (1), who believe it is synomymous with common goods only (2) and who deny it is a property and/or governance form (3).
   
   

Published Date

Categories